ACADEMY OF DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT – INSTITUTE OF SKY POLITICS

Stratagems of politics in the linkages of three forces

If one asks the question: what is the fundamental difference between the "Solomon Plan" (reds) and the conceptual basis of the doctrines of the liberals (blues) and the patriots (blacks), the answer will be this:

The projects of the "Eternal Kingdom of Israel" and the Chinese "Community of Shared Future for Mankind" (the reds of the new era) rely on the law of change in the linkages of three forces, whereas the other world projects are based on the biblical dogma: "whoever is not with us is against us, and the third is superfluous, there is no third."

The biblical scheme is dialectical – it is the struggle of opposites – the source of forward motion in linear progress.

The Chinese scheme provides for a third force in superposition above the clash of two opposites – the source of rotational motion in the cycle of change.

In 1974, at the UN General Assembly, the representative of the PRC, Deng Xiaoping, delivered a speech: "Chairman Mao Zedong's theory of the division of the world into three parts is the greatest contribution to the treasury of Marxism-Leninism" (without revealing the essence of the law of change). 

In the practice of change in the linkages of three forces, what is at issue is that "we ourselves," in a superposition of independence, self-reliance and reliance on our own forces, should turn out to be the external beneficiaries of the dialectic of confrontation between "our enemies" and "our allies." At the same time, "we ourselves" overcome "our enemies" insidiously: by the hands and at the expense of the efforts and losses of "our allies."

The scheme of politics in threes was brilliantly carried out by Mao in 1969. This scheme of military cunning (stratagem) is called in the literature "the cunning monkey from the mountain watches the clash of two tigers in the valley."

At that time the PRC ("we ourselves"), having instigated a border conflict with the USSR around Damansky Island on the Ussuri River and then near Lake Zhalanashkol in Kazakhstan, left the orbit of Moscow (the Treaty of Friendship and Alliance) and assumed a superposition above the clash of the two superpowers, the USSR and the USA. As a result, American technologies and investments ("our enemies'") flowed into China.

Twenty years later, having lost the "Cold War" to the USA, the USSR disintegrated. The skin of the fallen Soviet tiger – the resources and market of the Central Asian republics – went to China for nothing.

During WWII the "old reds" (Jews and communists of the USSR) were not in superposition, but in confrontation with the national socialists of Germany (blacks). In the end – after the collapse of the USSR – victory went to the "rotten Western democracies" (blues).

During WWIII of the new hybrid type, the "reds of the new era" (the Kabbalist Jews of the Solomon Plan and the Chinese of the Community of Shared Future for Mankind) are in superposition and, in the final analysis, will surely turn out to be the beneficiaries of the clash of the revanchist black international with the Western democracies. At the same time, like a scapegoat-provocateur that leads a herd of rams to the slaughterhouse, the campaign of the black nationalists against blue world liberalism is led by the religious nationalists of Chabad in black hats.

The scheme of change in the linkages of three forces operates universally at the historical, strategic and operational-tactical levels.

In the New Russia of democratic choice, the liberal "blue" character of power is fixed in the first three articles of the Constitution.

However, the specificity of Putin's Long State – the driving force of its development – is the open confrontation of the excessively Orthodox Z-patriots (blacks) with the systemic liberals, especially in the economy (blues), while the role and place of the "reds of the new era" in the system of power is not obvious.

An idea cannot be killed, therefore the "red line" hid itself in the Immortal Regiment movement – the brainchild of the "Victory" Organizing Committee. Having arisen as a popular initiative of memory, the movement acquired the framework of a non-commercial historical-patriotic organization of pride and heroism under the leadership of the "commanders" of the Kremlin. 

Since the patriotism of the movement is primordially linked to the Red Army, is unrelated to Orthodoxy, requires no registration, has taken on an international character and has stretched to our days – its cultural-political content insidiously colored Russia's coming victory in the destiny of worldliness in red.

War is always a clash of two sides (coalitions). War ends with the victory of one side and the defeat of the other.

Victory is fixed by the terms of peace, which are subject to international recognition. The unconditional benefit here goes to the third force, which did not directly participate in the war but ensured the political recognition of the results of the war.

In the Great Game of world projects, the bearers of the Solomon Plan need peace in order to resettle Jews onto the territory of historical Novorossiya in Ukraine. There, under the spiritual authority of the Hasidim, the Jews want to create a New Khazaria – the cherished place of meeting with the Messiah.

There is no doubt that the international recognition of the terms of peace in Ukraine with the autonomy of Novorossiya (under the Hasidim) will be organized in the best possible way by the Sons of the Covenant. 

The midwife at the birth of the new world order is armed violence, organized in the form of the Special Military Operation (SMO) of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation on the Ukrainian theater of operations of WWIII of the new hybrid type. 

In accordance with the stratagem, in the linkage of three forces, the defenders of the Constitution of the Russian Federation (blues) at the stage of international recognition of the terms of peace in Ukraine will politically outmaneuver the patriots of the SMO (blacks), thereby ensuring the cherished transfiguration of Rus' according to the design of the "reds." 

<b><strong style="white-space: pre-wrap;">the transfiguration of the Russian Federation according to the Greater Eurasia project in symbols of color</strong></b>
<b><strong style="white-space: pre-wrap;">the transfiguration of the Russian Federation according to the Greater Eurasia project in symbols of color</strong></b>

Greater Eurasia is not some geopolitical abstraction. Without any exaggeration, it is a civilizational project striving into the future. (V. Putin)

<b><strong style="white-space: pre-wrap;">the stratagems of the reds of the new era come from China</strong></b>
<b><strong style="white-space: pre-wrap;">the stratagems of the reds of the new era come from China</strong></b>

Executed by Andrey Devyatov No1137 of 21.08.26

Loading, 0